The hasty division of India and Pakistan in 1947 caused one of the largest refugee crises in history and left lasting scars. Learn about the violence and confusion that ensued, and how it still impacts the region today.

Discover the hidden history of Britain's post-war immigration laws and their imperial roots. Learn how citizenship and immigration policies shaped the Windrush scandal and continue to impact the UK today. Explore the connections between immigration laws and Britain's relationship with the rest of the world.

California's Reparations Task Force is investigating the harms African Americans have faced since 1850 and recommending how to repair the damage for all descendants of enslaved people now residing in the state. Task force member Jovan Scott Lewis, a University of California, Berkeley, associate professor of geography and chair of the geography department, shares his academic focus on reparations, detailed in numerous articles and two recent books. Learn about his books, the work of the task force, and why reparations are due to the descendants of the enslaved.

Ever wondered why corruption levels vary in African countries? A new study suggests that the legacy of colonial rule may be partly to blame. Find out how British colonial rule may have fostered the corruption of local elites (chiefs) and undermined society's trust in them. Discover the significant welfare implications of this on agriculture, natural resources, mining royalties, public goods, and economic development in many African societies.

Did you know that the treadmill was originally created in the 1800s as a punishment for English prisoners? However, social movements led by religious groups, philanthropies, and celebrities like Charles Dickens sought to change these dire conditions and help reform the prisoners. The treadmill was seen as a fantastic way of whipping prisoners into shape, and that added benefit of powering mills helped to rebuild a British economy decimated by the Napoleonic Wars. Although the original treadmill was banned for being excessively cruel, it returned with a vengeance in the 1970s as a way to improve aerobic fitness and lose unwanted pounds. Learning about the history of the treadmill can help you understand how social movements can bring about positive change and how ideas can evolve over time.

In a world of chaos and violence, how can we prevent ourselves from descending into anarchy? Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan explores this timeless question, arguing for a powerful sovereign to enforce security and the rule of law. Shocking his contemporaries, Hobbes' work of political philosophy opened up questions about statecraft and society that still influence governments worldwide. This fully revised edition includes a new introduction, making it an essential read for anyone interested in the nature of power and governance. Recommended for political science students, policymakers, and anyone interested in the nature of power and governance, Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan offers a thought-provoking analysis of the role of the state in preventing anarchy. Its insights into the nature of society and the need for a powerful sovereign to enforce security and the rule of law have influenced governments worldwide. This book also has relevance to those interested in philosophy, history, and law, making it a must-read for anyone seeking to understand the complexities of statecraft.

The social contract is a concept that has evolved over time and shaped the way that societies have functioned for centuries. This idea is based on the premise that individuals must give up some of their individual rights in exchange for the protection and security provided by a larger governing body. Throughout history, the social contract has been a topic of great debate and discussion. In the 17th century, philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke wrote extensively on the social contract, with Hobbes believing that the state should have absolute power over its citizens, and Locke arguing that individuals have natural rights that the state must respect. In modern times, the social contract has been shaped by a number of factors, including globalization, technological advancements, and the rise of multicultural societies. Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, made significant contributions to the field by arguing that the social contract should be based on universal principles of justice, such as the categorical imperative, which requires individuals to act in ways that can be universally applied. John Rawls, a 20th-century American philosopher, also made important contributions to the social contract. He argued that the social contract should be based on the principles of justice as fairness, which require individuals to treat each other fairly and impartially. Rawls believed that the social contract should be structured in such a way to work to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society. There have been numerous contributions to the field of the social contract by leading academics such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, and John Rawls. Each of these thinkers has brought their own unique perspectives and ideas to the table, adding to the rich history of the social contract and shaping the way it is understood and applied today.

Have you ever wondered what life would be like without the state? The idea of living without rulers may seem strange, but it's been done before. Archaeology shows our ancestors lived in peace for thousands of years before armed rulers appeared. Without the state, life would be less complicated, divisive, and confusing. Poverty would be slashed, and enterprise and innovation would flourish without the regulation that favors large corporations. We would do things voluntarily, and our cooperative and charitable nature would flourish. We could even develop a less rigid justice system that benefits from a reduction in crime and fear. The benefits of learning about the state and its role in society are both intellectual and practical. You'll gain a better understanding of the world around you and how it functions. You'll also be equipped with the knowledge to develop structures that self-govern from the bottom up, evolving as times change. So, let's explore the concept of the state together and see how we can thrive without it!

The pandemic has exposed the flaws in America's social contract and its ability to protect all citizens. Political philosopher Danielle S. Allen calls for a deeper understanding of the responsibilities of public decision-makers and citizens to repair the broken contract and build pandemic resilience and justice through good governance and strong bonds of solidarity.

Why have so many Native Americans fought for a country that has colonized and broken promises to them for centuries? The Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian is exploring this question in a new book and exhibition, "Why We Serve: Native Americans in the United States Armed Forces". The book highlights the unique traditions and motivations that Indigenous people bring to their military service, challenging stereotypes and shedding light on a long history of devotion to the U.S. military.

The ancient Romans were known for their brutal and violent approach to punishment, and one of the most notorious forms of execution was the practice of damnatio ad bestias. This involved throwing condemned criminals into an arena with wild animals, where they would be torn apart and devoured in front of a bloodthirsty audience. But what was the purpose of this gruesome spectacle? Some scholars argue that it served as a deterrent to would-be criminals, while others suggest that it was a form of entertainment for the masses. Still, others contend that it was a way for the ruling class to assert their dominance over the lower classes. Regardless of its purpose, damnatio ad bestias was a harrowing and terrifying experience for those who were forced to endure it. In some cases, criminals were even forced to fight against each other, adding a gladiator-like element to the proceedings. So who were the people who witnessed these horrific events? According to historian Keith Hopkins, the vast majority of spectators were not members of the upper class, but rather the urban poor who were attracted to the spectacle of violence and bloodshed. In fact, Hopkins suggests that these public executions were a way for the ruling class to distract the lower classes from their own poverty and suffering. But damnatio ad bestias was not just confined to the arena. The practice was also used as a form of punishment for political dissidents and enemies of the state. For example, the early Christian martyr Saint Ignatius of Antioch was sentenced to damnatio ad bestias in the second century AD, and was eventually devoured by lions in the Colosseum. In modern times, the practice of damnatio ad bestias is rightly seen as a barbaric and cruel form of punishment. But for the ancient Romans, it was just another way to assert their power and maintain order in a society that was often violent and chaotic.

In his new book, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer presents a fresh and compelling perspective on the Constitution and the role of the courts in promoting "active liberty" through citizen participation in government. Breyer argues that the Constitution's principles are adaptable and must evolve with the changing needs of society, making a strong case against treating it as a static guide for a bygone era. Through contemporary examples, Breyer challenges us to rethink our understanding of federalism, privacy, and affirmative action, making this book an essential contribution to the ongoing debate over the power and role of the courts. Recommended for students of law, political science, and American history, as well as anyone interested in the ongoing debate over the power and role of the courts in shaping government and society. Justice Breyer's fresh and compelling perspective challenges readers to think critically about the Constitution's principles and their adaptability to modern society. This book is particularly relevant for those interested in issues of federalism, privacy, and affirmative action, as Breyer uses contemporary examples to illustrate his arguments. Overall, this book is a must-read for anyone interested in the ongoing debate over the role of the courts in promoting citizen participation in government and shaping the future of our society.

In recent years, gun violence has become a global concern, and with it, discussions about gun ownership and firearm homicide have become increasingly relevant. The issue of gun violence is not limited to any one country or culture, but rather is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that varies widely across different regions and populations. At the heart of the debate on gun ownership and firearm homicide is the question of how cultural, social, economic, and political factors interact to shape attitudes towards guns and the extent to which they contribute to violence. Many scholars have explored this issue, and their work offers valuable insights into the complex relationships between culture, guns, and violence. For example, one key concept in this field is the notion of "gun culture," which refers to the social and cultural attitudes that promote gun ownership and use. Sociologist David Yamane has argued that the U.S. has a unique gun culture that is deeply ingrained in American society, and that this culture is a key factor in the high rates of gun ownership and gun violence in the country. Other academics, like Gary Kleck and John Lott, have explored the role of guns in self-defense and crime prevention, and have argued that increased gun ownership can lead to a reduction in crime rates. However, this view is not without its critics, and many scholars, like Franklin Zimring, have challenged the notion that more guns necessarily lead to more safety. The cultural differences in attitudes towards guns are also evident when we compare the U.S. to other countries. For example, in Japan, the ownership of firearms is strictly regulated and there are very low rates of gun violence. In contrast, countries like Mexico and Brazil have high rates of gun violence despite having relatively strict gun control laws. When it comes to exploring this topic further, there are many avenues for students to pursue. They might start by delving deeper into the concept of "gun culture" and exploring how it differs across different regions and populations. They might also explore the role of guns in self-defense, and consider the arguments both for and against the idea that more guns lead to greater safety. Finally, they might look at the differences in gun control laws across different countries and consider the factors that contribute to variation in gun violence rates. In conclusion, exploring the relationship between gun ownership and firearm homicide is a multifaceted endeavor that requires a cross-cultural perspective. By delving deeper into the concept of "gun culture" and exploring how it differs across different regions and populations, students can gain a better understanding of this pressing issue, and develop their own informed and nuanced perspectives on this topic.

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that values individual liberty and minimal government intervention. Its roots go back to the European Enlightenment and American independence in the 18th century. Libertarians believe in the principle of self-ownership and negative freedom, which means freedom from interference by others, especially the government. They advocate for a minimal state that only provides protection against force, theft, fraud, and enforcement of contracts, without public services such as health and education. Although critics argue that we need positive freedom, which includes access to things like decent housing, healthcare, and education, libertarianism's influence can be felt every time people attack big government or the nanny state. Learning about libertarianism can help students understand different political philosophies and develop critical thinking skills.

Discover how Spain is addressing the human rights violations committed during Franco's dictatorship, and the search for justice for the thousands of victims who disappeared. The new Law of Democratic Memory will legally require the Spanish government to recover the bodies of those who were killed or disappeared. Through a national DNA bank and a State Prosecutors' Office for Human Rights and Democratic Memory, the law seeks to investigate cases of human rights violations and investigate the thousands of mass graves scattered throughout Spain. This poignant reminder of political violence and historical trauma provides hope for families still searching for closure.

Xenophobia is the fear and hatred of foreigners, and it has a long history. In today's political climate, it is shaping political debates and causing harm to marginalized groups. Though it is not the same as racism, the two are often related. Xenophobic fears are easy to stir when inequality increases, and the pain felt by the so-called natives is turned onto the foreigner. However, society can tackle this trend by being more equal and providing for all. Learning about xenophobia and its effects can help us understand the world around us and work towards a more inclusive society. By exploring academic concepts like xenophobia, we can gain a deeper understanding of the world and the issues that affect us. This understanding can help us become more empathetic and informed citizens, and ultimately lead to a better world for all.

Moral relativism is the idea that what is right in one culture may be wrong in another, and there is no way to judge between the two. This means that different people have different moral rules and social customs, and there is no absolute truth of the matter. While this non-judgmental relativism might seem attractive, it can be problematic. For instance, in Nazi Germany, it became socially acceptable to treat Jews, homosexuals, and Gypsies as less than human. A relativist would have to say that this was 'right' for Nazi Germany. Some people go even further and say that everything is relative, including truth. However, the problem with this sort of relativism is that the theory itself would have to be relative. Learning about moral relativism and its limitations can help you develop critical thinking skills and make informed decisions about moral issues.

Imagine traveling on a high-speed train from Cape Town to Tunis, passing by the best universities in the world, breathtaking farmland, bustling metropolises, and vast solar panels. This is the promised land of Africa, a continent that powers the global economy and is unified into a shared economic and political vision. By learning about the history of Africa's resource control and rejection of Western development aid, you can understand how the continent is now able to prosper without interference. This knowledge not only benefits you intellectually but also practically, as it offers an escape to those in the Diaspora trapped in the West facing racism, poverty, and criminal injustice. Explore this topic through reading, reflection, writing, and self-directed projects, and discover the wealth of knowledge and opportunities that Africa has to offer.

Board games can be a fun pastime, but what happens when they reinforce prejudices and glorify colonial domination? Researchers at MIT and Dartmouth delve into the history of board games in their new book, "Playing Oppression," and analyze the assumptions baked into many of them. From the problematic elements of "Puerto Rico" to the glorification of empire-building in games like "Empires: Age of Discovery," this book sheds light on the legacy of conquest and empire in colonialist board games.

In 1833, Lydia Maria Child shocked readers with her book "An Appeal in Favor of that Class of Americans Called Africans," denouncing slavery and exposing its power in US politics. Child, together with a small group of activists, were not just antislavery, but abolitionists, convinced that slavery should end immediately and without compensation to enslavers. Despite facing backlash and sexism, Child's activism inspired the formation of the Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society and the first national political gathering of Black and white women, leading to legal protection for Black Americans in Massachusetts.